The evaluation comes from SiSoft Sandra’s website. SiSoft Sandra, evolved with the aid of using Adrian Silasi, is a long-jogging PC diagnostic and benchmarking tool. It incorporates a extensive variety of checks for comparing almost each component of a CPU’s overall performance and it has some of GPU checks as well. Sandra helps benchmarking in CUDA, OpenCL, and Microsoft’s DirectCompute.
According to SiSoft, Intel’s DG2 may be to be had withinside the A300, A500, and A700 households with as much as 1024, 3072, and 4096 streaming processors. Full specifications at the Arc A380 in comparison to main GPUs from Nvidia and AMD are proven below: There are a few surprises here. A 96-bit reminiscence bus is as an alternative uncommon and reminiscence bandwidth is a chunk decrease than we would have expected. A 75W board TDP is excellent — the A300 would possibly provide exemplary strength performance if that discern holds true —
However the whole loss of FP64 guide is unexpected. AMD and Nvidia each guide double-precision workloads on those GPUs, aleven though they restriction overall performance critically sufficient that it’s now no longer really well worth tons greater than a point out at the spec sheet. On paper, the DG2 appears greater just like the Radeon RX 6500 XT than the RTX 1660 Ti or RTX 3050. Like RDNA2, DG2 seems to choose excessive GPU clocks, a slim reminiscence bus, 32 render outputs and sixty four texture mapping units. It additionally has especially small caches as in comparison to the competition. Intel Arc A380 Benchmark Performance Unfortunately, SiSoft determined to graph the information in a number of their charts logarithmically, that can make it pretty tough to examine overall performance at a look among cards. We re-graphed the outcomes in their GPGPU medical computing check to make it less difficult to examine the cards. Single withinside the legend way single-precision.